At 19:14 5/9/99 , Roger wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with this OM product? I have several
>OM1's, recently had an OM2n stolen and want to replace it (one of the OM1's
>that I have owned since the 1970's) has stopped working.
[snip]
> I have never seen the 2000 in person, but do trust Oly to make fine
>machines.
>Thanks for any responses to a rather rambling question.
>Roger
Roger,
FWIW I have seen a OM-2000 and would recommend the OM-4ti over it. Cosina
makes the OM-2000 for Olympus. The OM-4 and OM-4ti would be closer to your
OM-2n (closer yet to an OM-2S) in function and construction.
You could also look for a used OM-2n, OM-4 or OM-4ti. Maybe others have
better sources, but looking for a true 9 to 10- OM-4 or OM-4ti requires
patience as I see them show up occasionally and disappear rapidly. There
seem to be larger numbers of 7 to 8+ ones around showing at least
considerable wear. If you go for an OM-4 make certain it's not a "battery
eater." The later "ti" version does not suffer this glitch that seems to
afflict a few of the plain 4's.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|