Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM2000

Subject: Re: [OM] OM2000
From: "Wayne Harrison" <wayno@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:51:50 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven_Read@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Steven_Read@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, May 09, 1999 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM2000


>
>>I strongly agree with all of the above, but would add that the one thing
the
>2000 has is that it's incredibly light. Especially with it's "standard"
lens.
>It makes my OM-4 with 50/1.2 feel like a brick.  (OM-2000:430g body + 185g
lens
>versus OM-4,50/1.2:540g +285g)  And the plastic (to me) has a nice feel in
the
>hand.  Honesty forces me to add that I do not yet own one, and have only
toyed
>with the idea of adding one to my collection of OM bodies.
>
>And oh yes, there is the smaller viewfinder thing...

    take it from someone who has both an om1 and an om4ti:  the 2000 is
nowhere close to being as esthetically pleasing as either of the former; but
if all you care about is taking good pictures, the latter will do quite
well, thank you.

wayne harrison
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz