In a message dated 5/10/99 2:53:42 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> As much as I would want the 90/2, it would not be prudent of me to
> buy it. And I didn't know a 100/2 existed...certainly going to be $$$ over
> either the 100/2.8 and 85/2, no? Soliciting advice,
> Siddiq, the new Zuikoholic (only one lens or tripod away from $1k less!)
> :-0
The 100/2 is a wonderful lens - big, heavy, expensive, sharp as a tack (Gary
R. described it as one of the sharpest Zuiko's). If I didn't already have
one, I might be inclined to go with the 90/2 instead, although the 100/2 does
focus quite close, and with extension tubes I find it a servicable macro
lens. I only dabble in macro, and I find it and the 50/1.8 fun to play with
and give me good results.
Paul Schings
Coventry, RI
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|