ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG

from Giles

Subject:	Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 28 May 1999 21:58:36 +0000

You got the story right up until you said AGFA - that should be Fuji ;-)

Giles

c.e. packard wrote:

> 4 rolls of AGFA Reala 100. My friends were VERY impressed with the results.
 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, (continued) RE: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, John Gettis Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Craig H RE: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Harridge, Wayne Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, M. Stephens Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Wayne Harrison Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, GMcGrath Re: [OM] Age Data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Glen Lowry Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG, c.e. packard Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Giles <= Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG, c.e. packard Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG, Keith (R.K.) Berry

Previous by Date:	Re: DRe: [OM] OM-4 Meter Reading, Giles
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Am I the only one body body?, Giles
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG, c.e. packard
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Age data was Non-OM, Non-NG, c.e. packard
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]