Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 100 f/2 vs 90 f/2 Macro

Subject: [OM] Re: 100 f/2 vs 90 f/2 Macro
From: "Tom Trottier" <infoanim@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 00:44:29 -0400
According to 
http://www.veluwen.demon.nl/om-sif/lensgroup.htm
the 100/2 is 520g while the 90/2 is 550g. The 100/2.8 is 230g.

The 350/2.8 and 250/2 are 3900g. They make the OM body the accessory...

Tom

> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 11:12:14 EDT
> From: ALEXSCIFI@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Re:  100 f/2 vs 90 f/2 Macro
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
...
> 
>     By the way, does anyone know the weight difference between the 2?
> 
> Alex
------------------
From: Tom Trottier, President, ACT Productions Inc.
infoanim@xxxxxx                   http://www.act.ca
+1 613 594-4829                 fax +1 613 594-8944
199 Holmwood Ave,  Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1S 2P3
"Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz