----- Original Message -----
From: <ClassicVW@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] IS-10 Windfall (?)
> IMO- the IS-10 is certainly NOT up to Olympus' robust standards. If I
> were looking for an IS series camera, I would get the IS-3 which is much
> more solidly built, I feel.
> (I know dozens of people will now respond that their IS-10 has been
> the "best camera they ever owned," this is My Experience Only) ! (And
> I no longer have either IS-10.)
>
> George S.
I really doubt that there are a dozen people on this list that owns an
IS-10. I can't argue with you about the quality of IS-10 since I never owned
any of the smaller IS's, but hopefully the quality was improved with the
later -10S/-20/-30 versions.
Per Nordenberg
Kolmården, Sweden
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|