Well there ya go! I was wondering about that just this morning.
Terry
"Barry B. Bean" wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 99 15:23:18 -0700, kelton wrote:
>
> >It recently dawned on me why the MC lenses often do better than the SC
> >lenses in the Reese tests. It's because the multi-coating adds additional
> >mass and weight to the lens, causing the lens to vibrate less, resulting
> >in sharper images. This *must* be true, because my 200 and 300 telephotos
> >are both MC, and they are MUCH heaver than my SC 50/1.8 and my SC 21/3.5.
>
> Apparently MC also magnifies the image! The 200 and 300 MC lenses and
> MUCH stronger than the puny SC 50 and 21!
>
> BBB
>
> -
> B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel
> bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Peach Orchard, MO
> http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|