> Hi all.
>
> After read a lot of messages concerning the MLU, the Gary´s tests and the
> differences between the test with the OM 1 and OM 4 on the 200 f 4, I
ask:
>
> What happens with the vibrations on the 200 f 5, 180 f 2.8, 75-150 or
> 65-200 ?
>
> I guess that with theese lenses or others, can happen the same effect.
> Theese are lenses without tripod mount and with a mass and weight
important
> on the bayonet.
>
> I shoot usually with the OM 4. From this perspective and kwnowing the new
> test of the 200 f 4 I think (like in the past) that this is a good lens.
> But, what must I think about the 200 f 5, 180 2.8, 75-150, etc? I guess
> that theese lenses will give better results with the new test on the OM
4.
>
> Gary, I know this big work an the rest of lenses waiting for test, but do
> you think to try the parallels tests on the OM 4 with theese lenses ?
Now
> I don´t know what to think about the 200 f 5, 180 f2.8, etc when I read
the
> actual test on the OM 1.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ángel Lobo
> CUENCA (Spain)
>
> angel.lobo@xxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|