Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was [OM] 200/4/now Richard S. joke

Subject: Re: was [OM] 200/4/now Richard S. joke
From: "gary edwards" <maitani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 10:49:08 PDT
Oops.  And I always laughed at the other guys who didn't get the joke.
Gary


From: Richard Schaetzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 200/4
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:14:47 +0200

Gary Edwards schrieb:
>
> Afraid it won't work.  Light bleed from the adjacent unmasked exposures
> will contaminate the contrast evaluation.

Yes, I know and division would go straight through the "sweet-spot" the
center of the lens.
My remark was meant to be humorous (it faild obiviously).

>
> Gary Edwards
>
> Richard Schaetzl wrote:
>
> > Tom Trottier schrieb:
> > >
> > > I never thought of masking half the frame to double the amount of
> > > testing, but it's a great idea!
> >
> > Halfframe? I haven´t thought of it, but that would be a great idea,
> > just think: Taking the first exposure with the lens to test and one of
> > this split-image-vignetting filters, ...

Regards

Richard



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz