On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Will von Dauster wrote:
> My point was similar to yours (I believe)
> in that they are both excellent systems, each has their strengths. My
> comments cited above were separate, and meant to compliment the quality and
> philosophy behind both systems by relating them to the philosophy by which I
> attempt to live.
We're in agreement, then.
> BTW, I certainly prefer the OM-3 and 4 (T, Ti, etc) over the current Leica
> R8. While a capable instrument, I found the R8 to be heavy, clumsy, and just
> inelegant.
Yes, the R-8 is into brick-hood, looks like a Contax on steroids.
Besides, while the M-series have very little competition (the Contax G),
there's plenty for the R-series. If I had the money, I'd love to
pick up two OM-3ti's, a 21/2.0 and the 35-80...
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|