Tom's macro inquiry got me thinking about an upcoming project: Shooting
close-ups of an ornate pocketwatch that belonged to my grandfather. I
have the 50/2 macro, but this lens isn't well suited for really close
work (I'm told) or (I'm also told) for use with extension tubes. Why?
Would I be better off with the 100 2.8 (or the 50 1.8) and extenders? I
probably need about 5 or 6mm of critical DOF.
I'll probably use the T32 off-camera with a half-milk jug grotto as a
diffuser, and the 2S or 2N.
Morgan Sparks
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|