In a message dated 8/22/99 11:04:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> 1) Is there really a difference in handheld shots depending on the body
> I use nothing longer than the 75-150 mm lens, now but might get a 65-200
> sometime in the future.
I have an OM-1, OM-2S, and an OM-4. I find no appreciable difference in image
quality between the three. I wouldn't expect anything, either.
> 2) Is there really an advantage to the OM 3T compared to the OM 4Ti in
> normal photography? It seems to me that if you can live with the battery
> requirements of the OM4-Ti it is by far the better camera.
It would seem so, wouldn't it?
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >