TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] OM-3T vs OM 4TI

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-3T vs OM 4TI
From: Pauls0627@xxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:26:44 EDT
In a message dated 8/22/99 11:04:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
rmydgy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> 1)  Is there really a difference in handheld shots depending on the body 
used?
> 
>  I use nothing longer than the 75-150 mm lens, now but might get a 65-200
>  sometime in the future.

I have an OM-1, OM-2S, and an OM-4. I find no appreciable difference in image 
quality between the three. I wouldn't expect anything, either.

>  2)  Is there really an advantage to the OM 3T compared to the OM 4Ti in
>  normal photography?  It seems to me that if you can live with the battery
>  requirements of the OM4-Ti it is by far the better camera.

It would seem so, wouldn't it?

Paul Schings

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>