Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] (OT) High Mountain photos

Subject: RE: [OM] (OT) High Mountain photos
From: Skip Williams <skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 16:26:07 -0400
Especially the 200/5, it's so small, most people would think it's a 135. Mine takes nice images. They're cheap too, $100-150.

Skip

At 8/24/99 12:12 PM  -0500, you wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:28:22 +0200, Chmielewski, Artur wrote:

>18/3.5
>28/2
>35/2
>50/3.5
>85/2

Since weight is an issue, why not leave the 35 at home? Between the
28 and the 50, it would seem like you have the range covered.

If it were me, I'd give serious thought topicking up a 200/4 or 200/5
as well - helps you pick out details in those landscapes, or isolate
subjects.

BBB
-
B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Peach Orchard, MO http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


-----------------------------------------------
Skip Williams
Westfield, NJ
skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz