Besides the question if MC really adds something to a specific picture, I
was wondering if anybody has any experience with quality changes during the
years. As many lensen have several "releases" sometimes spanning a time
period 10 years or more I was wondering if anybody noticed improvment (or
decline) in the quality of some type of lensen during the years. Untill now
I assume that the later lensen (being MC) should be better, including more
recent research.
Has anyone information on that?
Ab Abbinga
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Dirk Wright <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Aan: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: dinsdag 31 augustus 1999 16:36
Onderwerp: [OM] multicoated lenses???
> How important is multicoating for an average hobbiest like myself? I have
3
> zuiko lenes, a 28/3.5, 50/1.8, and 135/3.5, none of which appear to be
> multicoated. They all have only two colors (blue and yellowish) reflected
> in their glass. The seem to work just fine. Should I pursue MC lenses as
> replacements for some of them?
>
> Be seeing you.
>
> Dirk Wright
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|