| Subject: | Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF |
|---|---|
| From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Oct 1999 21:13:55 +1000 |
> BTW, I made a quick and dirty test of Kodachrome 64, and it reflected about 1/3 > stop more than the 18 0ray card. Ahh, yes, but what does unexposed Kodachrome look like? Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Question on X/FP switch, Terry and Tracey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2 w T-32 was (Fwd) OM-2 Meter, Terry and Tracey |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Chip Stratton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Richard Schaetzl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |