Yes, but that wasn't what you asked, was it?
Given that you already have the IS-3 for AF use, by all means, I'd
stick with your OM investment, spring for the 4T and fast glass, and
keep "runnin' what brung yuh".
On Mon, 18 Oct 1999 11:26:57 -0500, Ken Norton wrote:
>I am contemplating the thoughts of forgetting the system change and just
>building my current OM system up. I figure that if I get a new OM-4Ti and
>a couple super lenses like the 350/2.8, 90/2 and a 21mm would set me up
>pretty well.
>
>At this point, does it make sense to completely change systems and spend
>twice as much to get half as much? My current equipment is still very
>good, albeit showing use. I figure that I might have a far better chance
>at convincing my wife that a new OM-4Ti and a 350/2.8 is as good of a value
>as a Nikon F5 with a zoom lens.
>
>Just maybe, it would be better for me to keep with "ancient technology" and
>establish myself with a certain style than to keep up with the masses. Who
>knows....
>
>Ken Norton
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
-
B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel
bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peach Orchard, MO
http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|