Not to quibble, George, but he did say "Ti" not "T" which implies, at
least stateside, most likely a new one. I agree with you, if I was
earning my living with it I would want the newest unit I could get for
reliability. On the other hand, I've bought two used -4Ts - one a Class 2
from Olympus and one a photo shop consignment of completely unknown
heritage. Both have rendered fine, reliable service; to some degree a
testimonial to the design's ruggedness. You should have seen how beat up
Paul Knutson's -4T was, but it worked.
Glad that you are still with us, Ken. Maybe we can argue again about
bootlegged concert photography..[Good work, Lars!]. (just kidding, I've
learned some better manners.)
Gary
"George M. Anderson" wrote:
> Ken;
>
> Get a new one so you'll have no worries about condition. After all, a
> used one could be up to 14 or 15 years old.
>
>
> >
> SNIP
> >
> > Yup, folks, it's an Olympus OM-4Ti.
> >
> > Ken Norton
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|