Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Utah pictures I

Subject: RE: [OM] Utah pictures I
From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 19:29:36 -0600
Hi Dave,

The images are very nice but, yes, they are gargantuan -- for the purpose.
You can probably do "save as" in PS and pull the quality slider all the way
to 0 (that's right, zero) and still have a great looking image.  I would
suggest experimenting though, as you're likely to get moire patterns in the
blue sky if you compress too much.  I'd recommend re-saving the file at a
lower quality and checking it by selecting File > Open Page in Netscape of
IE just to see how it looks in  a browser.  PS seems more subtle and
refined than Netscape or IE at viewing images.  Unfortunately you view the
web with Netscape or IE.

Joel Wilcox
Iowa City, IA USA

At 04:10 PM 11/15/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>Acer,
>
>Thanks!  The images are around 250K each.  JPG compression was at the low 
>end of the "High" quality in Photoshop 4.0.  Are the files too large?
>
>I *believe* I used the unsharp mask on all pics, but might have hit 
>"sharpen" instead.
>
>I've got to get w/George M. re scanning the Antelope Canyon shots -- my 
>prints are beautiful (much more detail, less contrast, etc.) but I can't 
>seem to translate that into a scan.  If I lower the contrast enough to 
>bring out the shadow detail then the blacks turn milky gray, which I hate.
>
>ANY input on the photography or the scanning is welcome & appreciated!
>
>Dave
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  Acer V [SMTP:siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent:  Monday, November 15, 1999 1:23 PM
>To:    'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>Subject:       Re: [OM] Utah pictures I
>
>Lovely!
>
>A few comments if you allow moi:
>
>how large (in kbs) are the images? jpg compression? how much? (there's not
>apparent signs of compression, which is good, but downloads are taking a
>bit long--that could be this computer though)
>
>There are spots of color around/on edges on the photos if you look
>closely....Caused by sharpening filter (or unsharp mask--no real
>experience with the former), looks like, or could be something else. It's
>not my eyes, they are there. Most noticeable on
><http://home.austin.rr.com/davebulger/> in the tree limbs. It seems like
>you used the sharp filter, not the unsharp mask. Don't hold me to this,
>though, as I myself am relatively new to this game :-)
>
>The /ant#.htm photos are gorgeous! Couldn't figure out what they were from
>the thumnails, but upon loading the main image, wow.
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz