I have a f3.5. Great lens. 49mm thread. 1/2 macro. I wouldn't go the f2.0 as
it weighs more and would be incompatable with my filters.
Excellent lens. If it doesn't meet your requirements, mail it to me and I'll
look after it.
Foxy
----- Original Message -----
> The 3.5 is a fine lens, unless you are disatisfied with it, there's no
> reason to return it.
>
> > Yes I understand. please see my response from earlier this evening John
at
> > 385 for the 50mm 3.5 should I be looking to return the merchandise and
> > purchase the f2 .I need to do macro, portraits and body shots.
> > Lou
>
> > List price on new 3.5s and 2s is so high that even discounted most
people
> > will look extensively for "used" first. List price on the 3.5 used to
be
> > $640, f2: $874, 90mm f2: $1419. This was before price "adjustments"
made
> > over a year ago.
> >
> > John
> > > John,
> > > Thanks for your reply; the lens I bought was new if that changes
> anything?
> > > It may even be returnable the dealer told me that dealer price on that
> > lens
> > > is over $900. what is the F2 lens
> > > Does anyone know where I can get a 25mm extension tube or a 100 or 135
> mm
> > > lens for portraits?
> > > Lou
> > >
> > >
> > >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|