In a message dated 11/24/99 11:11:40 AM Eastern Standard Time,
image66@xxxxxxx writes:
> I wonder if the 100/2.8 just might be an exception to the "rules" here. I
> have a silver-nosed, non-MC marked lens that doesn't have any of the normal
> SC reflections, but has many of the normal MC reflections.
I thought some of the early lenses were MC from the start, in particular the
fast wides. Perhaps the 100/2.8 was one of these exceptions?
Paul Schings
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|