I hope you're kidding. That'd be a cruel joke to a macro guy like me.
I've always envied the 200/4 Micro-Nikkor. And now you're telling me that
Olympus had something like that and didn't produce it??!
<ggrrr>
Skip
At 11/24/99 09:09 AM -0800, you wrote:
How about a Zuiko 150/2.8 macro? Details to follow.
George
Skip Williams wrote:
>
> I for one want to see that 160/3.5. That'd be a new one. Do you pictures
> of the 100/2, 160/3.5, 500/5.6, 800/9 , or the1200/14? Or are they just
> drawings?
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
-----------------------------------------------
Skip Williams
Westfield, NJ
skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|