Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1284

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1284
From: "Frank Wijsmuller of Milou van der Bel" <Wijsmuller.VanderBel@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:10:38 +0100
When Olympus dropped 'MC' and left only 'Zuiko', they changed something
else:
my silver nosed 35mm/2.8 reads:   AUTO-W 1:2.8 f=35mm
while my newer 24mm/2.8 reads:   AUTO-W 24mm 1:2.8

So they changed position and deleted 'f='. Now I think they only did this
with (black nosed) MC lenses.

Therefore, I think that any black-nosed Zuiko with first the mm's and second
the maximum aperture without 'f=' is multi-coated.

Anyone who has information that this is no valid assumption?


Joseph wrote:
>Later, all Zuiko lenses were multicoated, and the MC was dropped with all
>lenses marked Zuiko.
>
>The upshot is that "X.Zuiko" lenses, for whatever letter X, are always
>single-coated.  "Zuiko MC" lenses are always multocoated.  But a lens
>marked only "Zuiko" can be either singlecoated or multicoated.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1284, Frank Wijsmuller of Milou van der Bel <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz