Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 55/1.2 or 50/1.2

Subject: Re: [OM] 55/1.2 or 50/1.2
From: Skip Williams <skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 14:05:00 -0500
I asked this question several weeks ago and the consensus was that the newer, MC 50/1.2 was a lot better. I consequently bought one for $250, which seemed to be the average price from the 4 U.S.-based dealers that had them in stock when I went looking. The average of the two Ebay sales I have on my history page (http://www.skipwilliams.com/Zuiko_Ebay_History.htm) was $237, but I don't know the condition of those lenses.

I like the lens, but I don't have a 55/1.2 for comparison.

Skip


At 12/13/99 10:18 PM  +0530, you wrote:
Just thought I'd use the list's collective wisdom: Is the 50/1.2 really
vastly superior to the 55/1.2? If so, how?
I have the 55/1.2 and am being offered the 50/1.2 at a
not-completely-outrageous price; should I snap? What is the usual price for
a lens in 9+ condition?
Thanks,
RK



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


-----------------------------------------------
Skip Williams
Westfield, NJ
skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz