ML Archiv: RE: [OM] 300/4.5

Subject:	RE: [OM] 300/4.5
From:	Ken Norton <image66@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:50:07 -0600

For motor sports photography I'd take the Tamron 300/2.8 over the Zuiko
300/4.5.  The extra brightness cannot be discounted, nor can internal
focusing.  The Zuiko 300/4.5 is a bear to follow focus in comparision to a
good IF lens.

I believe the Tamron is an IF lens.  Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.

Ken Norton

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 300/4.5, (continued) Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Clyde Soles Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Clyde Soles Re: [OM] 300/4.5, george Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Frank Ernens Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Motor Sport Visions Photography Re: [OM] 300/4.5, bhinderks RE: [OM] 300/4.5, Dave Bulger RE: [OM] 300/4.5, Skip Williams RE: [OM] 300/4.5, Barry B. Bean Sv: [OM] 300/4.5, LARS BUNDESEN RE: [OM] 300/4.5, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Mike Butler Re: [OM] 300/4.5, GFaulk7376 Re: [OM] 300/4.5, WKato [OM] Christmas Zuiko goodies!, Garth Wood Re: [OM] Christmas Zuiko goodies!, Tom Trottier Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Hans van Veluwen

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] Yet another online gallery..., Ron Spolarich
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] showing age, was: the future of OM, Jim Mueller
Previous by Thread:	Sv: [OM] 300/4.5, LARS BUNDESEN
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 300/4.5, Hans van Veluwen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]