Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1312

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1312
From: Christoph Berndt <christob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 15:49:11 +0100
Hi dear Olympionics,

nice to meet this list - since
Friday last week i´m reading,
compliments to the owner(s) of the
list,  thank you for  your work.

Maybe it will be interest for you
who i am.

first: my english language is not
VERY good ;-) - so, please be
patient and, if you may, give
critics to me - i wanna learn  :-))

I´m living in Münster - Germany,
Westfalian - and i´m (surprise,
surprise) a german.

my first camera was an OM-2, i
bought it in 1978 - several months
of hard working as a newsvendor
were necessary - i never regret.

In the 80s i become a pro at a
local newspaper - local stuff of
reportage - time after time i
bought other OMs and lenses -
Om-1n, OM-3, OM-4, OM-4T - lenses
about 18mm up to 300mm, all ZUIKOS.
my favorite is the 2/24 - i love
it, mostly used available light
with b/w-Film Kodak PAN 400, or
newer, T-Max 3200 with D-76 or
T-Max developer.

One of the merits of the OM i found
as a pro, that is its less weight -
my  equipment was 1/3 lighter than
CANON or NIKON, but not less in
quality. The colleagues had to go
daily to their
physiotherpeuts.......;-)). And the
solidity of the OM-system was/is
not worse - but the service
(Hamburg) was much faster and very
friendly all time. 

In the 90s i changed my profession
- now im a musician and
music-teacher - but still an
engaged  Foto-Amateur-semipro - and
i don´t want to change the
OM-System, ´cause it depends to a
1000n me. Autofocus i never need
- an not any other "Schnickschnack".

on the other hand i worked with
Hasselblad and a 6x9cm
Linhof-Technika with ZEISS-lenses -
including the fantastic Biogon 53mm.

BTW: bevore the ZUIKO 3.5/18mm i
bought a TOKINA 3.5/17mm - and i
found it was a very good glass (not
only for the price (ca 180 US$)).
But later (enough money after a
while) i take the ZUIKO. i found,
that it is sharp and absolutel y
useful at an aperture of f3.5. The
vignetting is not bad - you can
work it out in the darkroom - only
dias are sometimes a problem at f3.5.

Actually i bought a SIGMA fisheye
2.8/16mm at ebay - for 220US$ -
still now i ask myself about its
quality - any opinions here about?

What do you think about the 2/28mm?
I can get it for ca 240 US$ - is
that okay?

Thanks for your courtesy

have a nice Xmas and a Happy New Year

with regards, Christoph

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz