> You might have the following problems:
> 1. OM-2 may be a little weak (not likely)
> 2. 80-200 may have bent pin or be stiff
> 3. Teleconverters might be CHEAPLY made, especially if off-brand
I'd probably guess it's #3. The 2x is by Toyo Optics, and the 3x is a
Spiratone.
> You also haven't specified what (who) makes the 80-200. It is possible that
> it, too, may have a quality problem...
It's made by Cimko. It "feels" like a good lens, and it works correctly on
the body without the teleconverter attached.
> Your comment about shifting the
> Teleconverter gives me some concern that is where the problem is. Also, you
> shouldn't be able to shift it much at all, almost none!
>
> If you haven't been involved in photography for a while, someone may have
> "seen you coming" and sold you some gear that is a little marginal in
> performance...
That's probably the case. I never really dealt with teleconverters or
telephoto lens back in high school. All I had was the standard 50.
> If you are looking for lenses other than Olympus Zuiko, stick
> to the major brands like Vivitar, Tokina, Sigma and Tamron. Some other
> brands can, not will, be bad news.
>
> An aside note. Most folks really avoid the 3x Teleconverters. You lose 3
> stops of light and the contrast also goes in the dumper. If you have the
> opportunity, try exchanging the 3x for a wide angle or a flash or ...
>
> Whatever you do, don't try oiling any part of the lens of OM. You'll regret
> it for a long time. Take it to someone that can give you the right kind of
> help.
Thanks, Brian.
Render me gone, |||
Bob ^(===)^
----------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo----------------------------------
A polar bear is a rectangular bear after a coordinate transform.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|