| Subject: | [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1351 |
|---|---|
| From: | tecwfm@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:39:39 +0000 |
I have been looking for a used OM3 or OM4, and have noticed that the OM3 seems to retain it's value a little better than the OM4. Since the OM4 is an automatic and the OM3 is manual, why the demand for the OM3? Bill M.... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Reagan Lied, Bush Lied, Clinton Lied and the war of the Olympus cameras, Erik Stiegler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] JPEG 2000 piece in NYTimes, Morgan Sparks |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] My thoughts om OM4 and/or suggestions, should an OM5 ever be...and new Zuiko-glass - ahh...., Thomas Heide Clausen |
| Next by Thread: | OM-3 value Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1351, Barry B. Bean |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |