Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: editing ethics - Re: [OM] OM Photos for your critique

Subject: Re: editing ethics - Re: [OM] OM Photos for your critique
From: "Barry B. Bean" <bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:09:07 -0600 (CST)
Please note that I did not write what appears to be attributed to me
below.

On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:26:04 -0600, Joel Wilcox wrote:

>At 11:59 PM 1/18/2000 EST, you wrote:
>>bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>><< I think the artist is free to
>> digitally manipulate photographs in the same way that he manipulates
>> the image by choice of shutter speed, aperture, POV, focal length,
>> film, developing, andprinting. >>
>>
>>It was interesting how vehemently the list tended to disagree with this view 
>>when it was discussed previously in connection with ADITL.. 
>
>My recollection is that the vehemence had to do with a species of
>manipulation more intrusive than color balance, contrast, gamma, and
>saturation -- as in for instance removing unwanted, unattractive objects
>from the scene.
>
>Joel Wilcox
>Iowa City, Iowa USA
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>

-
B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel                              
bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peach Orchard, MO                                       
http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz