Re: [OM] Considering switch to Oly

[george]

Yes, I picked up on this 'lack of long APO lenses' too.

What about the Zuiko 180/2?   250/2?  350/2.8?   

george


Dirk and Carla Wright wrote:
> 
> >
> >      *     The only major weakness--lack of APO lenses in the 180-400
> range
> >             is offset by the availability of the Tamron 180F2.5,
> 80-200F2.8
> >and
> >             400F4.0 LD lenses in adaptall mount for OM.
> >
> >Alex
> >
> 
> I think that just because the zuiko lenses in this range are not marked
> "APO" does not mean that they are in fact apochromatic. Also, I think I read
> on this list a while back that the 300/4.5 has LD glass in it. Olympus is
> not a company that shouts it's features like many other brands, much to it's
> disservice.
> 
> Be seeing you.
> 
> Dirk Wright
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >