Ron S. writes:
<< Gary: I'm certainly not a technohead but I'm wondering what your
objection
is to the 24 F2? >>
Gary responded:
>>1. Pronounced waveform distortion. This lens looks like it has an
aspherical element in it. One can often detect an aspherical lens by
straight lines being rendered as waves. I'll accept waveforming in a
zoom, but in a prime?? I blindly SQF graded the results from this lens.
I THOUGHT I was looking at the results of an IS-3 at 35mm . . .
2. I think the wide open and one stop down performance, coupled with
strong light fall-off ("my "vignetting") makes this a dicey choice for
available light photography.
3. Cost. For what you get in performance, it sure seems overpriced.<<
I'll have to pay close attention to the photos I take with this lense to see
if for myself. Thanks for the information.
RonS
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|