[I should have retitled this: PHOTODOODOO :-)]
Oh-oh...NOW you've done it, Dirk !
MTF curves never lie.
The numbers always tell us what's best.
You can't trust your own eyes.
Boys, better start dumping those lousy 100/2.0's NOW.
Not as good as the ancient Nikkor 10-5 2-5 ?
* THE HORROR *
Not to mention the 90/2.0. For shame...
Now if the price will just drop on those so-so lenses...
...and the 24/2.0's (I could use a spare).
************jk****************
*= Doris Fang =*
---------------------------------------
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Dirk Wright wrote:
> >From the photodo web site, comparable lenses followed by they photodo
> grade:
>
> OM 100/2 - 3.9
> Canon 100/2 - 4.2
> Minolta 100/2 - 4.4
> Nikon 105/2.5 - 4.2
> Leica Apo-Macro-Elmarit-R 100/2.8 - 4.5
> OM 90/2M - 4.2
> Leica Summicron-M 90/2 - 4.3
> Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 - 4.6
> Tamron SP 90/2.5 - 4.2
> Contax G Sonnar 90/2.8 - 4.4
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|