Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] lens comparasons

Subject: Re: [OM] lens comparasons
From: Pauls0627@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:26:18 EST
In a message dated 01/27/2000 5:21:22 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
geanders@xxxxxxxxx writes:

> >OM 100/2 - 3.9
>  >Canon 100/2 - 4.2
>  >Minolta 100/2 - 4.4
>  >Nikon 105/2.5 - 4.2
>  >Leica Apo-Macro-Elmarit-R 100/2.8 - 4.5
>  >
>  >OM 90/2M - 4.2
>  >Leica Summicron-M 90/2 - 4.3
>  >Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 - 4.6
>  >Tamron SP 90/2.5 - 4.2
>  >Contax G Sonnar 90/2.8 - 4.4

Geez, I hope the list doesn't get into an uproar over this one. They test all 
the lenses at infinity, for starters. Why test a macro lens at infinity? They 
also don't consider distortion, flare, or contrast in the MTF number.

I like my 100/2. It gives me great images. So does my 24/2, in fact. I don't 
even care if their prices on the used market just went down significantly. 
They aren't for sale!

Paul Schings

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz