On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, george wrote:
> There'll be a lot of debate on this one. My vote goes to the OM 2000.
> You've already got one OM-1. So if you need motor drive capability, you've
> got a body that'll do that (the 2000 will not) The 2000 you buy new, so
> theoretically it'll need less of your $$$ to service over the next 5-10
> years (yeah, debatable point). It also has 2 things the OM-1 does not:
> Spot meter and shutter and aperture pre-fire on self-timer, and one thing no
> other OM body has: multiple-exposure lever.
It also has what no other OM SLR has: 1/125th synch.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|