Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] which 50 for interior architecture?

Subject: RE: [OM] which 50 for interior architecture?
From: Acer V <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Cc: "'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Windrim, Brian wrote:

>Hi Acer,
>
>you asked:
>
><SNIP>
>>> Or to put it in bottom line: 50/1.8MC or 50/3.5 macro? Will the increase
>>> in DOF (f/16 vs f/22) be worth it or not at 8*10 size?
>
>Can I turn this around and suggest that you use *both* and then *tell us*
>which was more successful?
>
>Since you'll be working with a static subject and (presumably) a tripod,
>swapping 50s shouldn't be too much of a chore, and since you'll be doing
>your own printing you're ideally placed to assess the results.
>
>Actually I would suggest trying 3 combinations:
>
>50/1.8 @ f16
>50/3.5 @ f16
>50/3.5 @ f22
>
>just be sure to keep notes about the order of the exposures on the film! :-)

Indeed.

/Acer V
--
goosnargh


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz