Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Better Flash recs & handle mounted flash Q

Subject: Re: [OM] Better Flash recs & handle mounted flash Q
From: "Rand E." <rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:38:02 -0500
Wayne,
  Technically you are correct in your application of the Inverse Square
Law.  Actually you proved the issue that I was putting forth.  Two
T32's=GN44.8, which was the target GN of the original posting of the
thread.  The GN and much more control and versitility and the ability to
use up to 8 or 9 of the flashes.
Rand E.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Harridge, Wayne" wrote:
> 
> Rand E wrote:
> 
> > and T20 combinations.  Sometimes using my Sunpak 433D or 422D for a
> > little added punch.  Two T32's=GN64 with better and more controllable
> > light output with the ability  to use them on the BG2 and run them off
> > "C" cells.
> 
> 2X T32 gives a total GN of 32x1.4=44.8 (meters), to get 64 you would need 4x
> T32.
> 
> Wayne Harridge
> Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz