Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] The OM that Olympus never built

Subject: RE: [OM] The OM that Olympus never built
From: "Ron Spolarich" <caesar2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 22:56:13 -0500
Get back thee Satan!  Blasphemer!! <g>

I've seen the Aria too and I agree though I'm not so sure of the price you
quote. The B&H catalog has the body for only $589.  At that price, go ahead
and indulge.

RonS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Garth Wood
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 9:28 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] The OM that Olympus never built
>
>
> Oh, man, I'm probably gonna burn in Zuiko Hell for this, but...
>
>
> ...I'm *lusting* after the Contax Aria.  It's the OM-6 Olympus
> should have built, but didn't.  Contax lenses are more expensive
> than Zuikos, and I have no idea if they're better or not, but the
> Aria body made me blurt out "Maitani must have designed this!"
> while I was checking it out at McBain's Cameras about ten days
> ago.  The salesman who was assisting me (himself a long-time Oly
> owner) just laughed and nodded.
>
> Of course, I'm not giving up my OMs, but boy am I tempted to drop
> a few grand and take the pain in my wallet...
>
> Garth
>
>
>
> "A bad day doing photography is better
>   than a good day doing just about
>   anything else."
>
> The Unofficial Olympus Web Photo Gallery at:
>
>     http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz