Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 90mm vs 135mm 4.5? AND 80mm???

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 90mm vs 135mm 4.5? AND 80mm???
From: Tatu Laitinen <sara.laitinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 22:41:30 +0200

Johnsonpa@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Where does ths 80/4 macro fit into this line-up?
> i.e. can somebody give me a comparison of the 90/2 and 80/4?

Hi,
I have made a lot of comparison shots with both lenses on the ratio of
1:1. The difference in image quality is minimal. Both serve a different
purpose. 80/4 works great with insects (with the f170mm diopter) when
used with T28 macro flash. Working distance is a bit small but results
are stunning.  90/2  works better when the flash is mounted on a
bracket. (I have a very similar design as in J.Shaws "closeups in
nature"). I most often use the 90/2 without the aid of flash, when very
natural looking insect or flower shots are needed.(f2=speed).  80/4 is
much faster to use for  insects because it works for 2:1-1:2 range on
65-116! Hope this helps.....

Tatu Laitinen

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz