Yes, indeed, this is just what Rohn Engh recommends. It's also much cheaper then
having a dupe done, especially a reproduction quality one. On the other hand,
you must be very careful that your "in camera dupes" are truly identical if your
doing this for sale. Photobuyers expect to get precisely what they're paying
for. This all assumes you recognize the shot as timeless and you have the
ability to shoot it more than once. I, for example, have never been able to get
a Yeti to stand still long enough.
>>> Acer V <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 03/20/00 11:46pm >>>
I'm planning on taking two identical shots on KChrome if I think it is
something truly spectacular. That way, you can keep one in archive, and
project one...in fact, it's a good idea to double to treble the
once-in-a-life shots, exposure/compositional bracketing not
withstanding. This way, no need to worry about the losses and contrast
gain inherent in duping. Yes?
/Acer V
--
Coming soon to a browser near you: The Whole Sort Of General Mish Mash,
now frames-enriched at no extra-charge!
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|