In a message dated 00-03-22 10:18:10 EST, you write:
> I would like to know if someone have some information one a Vivitar 400mm
> F5.6. Is it a good lens? Is it better than a Sigma 400mm F5.6? I checked
> some
> lens test page but found nothing about this lens. Also, what price should I
> pay for it?
>
> Thanks!
>
> François
I still have one of these somewhere. This lens is about 25 years old I
believe and came out at about the same time as a Vivitar TX lens. Check to
see if it is a TX adaptable lens as the TX version was sharper than the
non-TX. The TX version had resolution in the range of 37 to 47 lpm and
moderate contrast at that level. This version also had internal focusing so
was much better close-up. I also had a Sigma 400/5.6 (gray Zen finish
internally focusing model) which was sharper and contrastier but sold it
because it was just about the same as the Zuiko 300/4.5 with the 1.4X
converter. The Sigma lens are ranked as follows in increasing sharpness and
contrast: 400 regular focus, 400 internal focus, 400 APO, and 400 APO/Macro.
I have seen the Vivitar go for $150 on eBay but think it is overpriced at
that level and would rather have a Sigma at a similar price.
Warren
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|