ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Re NASA lens

Subject:	Re: [OM] Re NASA lens
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 2 Apr 2000 19:31:34 +0000

I am wrong, it is not the 180/2, must be the f2.8.

Giles

Giles wrote:

> From:          "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:            olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date:          Sun, 2 Apr 2000 07:59:49 +0000
> Subject:       Re: [OM] Re NASA lens
> Reply-to:      olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> 
> Thats the 180mm f2 not the f2.8
> 
> Giles
> 
> Skip Williams wrote:
> 
> > The OM-4/180-2.8 camera/lens combos were destined for use in the Space 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re NASA lens, Stewart Dean Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Skip Williams Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Acer V Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Giles Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Acer V Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Giles <= Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, John Hermanson Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Lars Haven Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Garth Wood Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, gary edwards Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Garth Wood [OM] One last question, Tom Scales Re: [OM] One last question, Volkhart Baumgaertner Re: [OM] One last question, Giles Re: [OM] One last question, John Hermanson Re: [OM] One last question, Charles Sdunek

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] questions about other low ev cameras, JOHN SCHEUERER
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] In the studio (of sorts) - selective response, Dirk Wright
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Acer V
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, John Hermanson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]