ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Re NASA lens

Subject:	Re: [OM] Re NASA lens
From:	Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:33:11 -0600

At 10:06 AM 4/3/00 -0700, Gary Edwards wrote:
>It wasn't accidental.  They brought back the film magazines but intentionally 
>left the cameras and lenses behind.  Every kilo they left behind was that much 
>more mass of moon rock specimens that could be brought back to Earth.  Moon 
>rocks were much more valuable than a camera.

Makes sense!

Garth


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re NASA lens, Stewart Dean Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Skip Williams Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Acer V Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Giles Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Acer V Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Giles Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, John Hermanson Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Lars Haven Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Garth Wood Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, gary edwards Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Garth Wood <= [OM] One last question, Tom Scales Re: [OM] One last question, Volkhart Baumgaertner Re: [OM] One last question, Giles Re: [OM] One last question, John Hermanson Re: [OM] One last question, Charles Sdunek Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Mark Marr-Lyon Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Paul Wallich Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Dirk Wright Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, WKato Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, Paul D. Farrar

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] rear coating, Garth Wood
Next by Date:	Re: TTL VS Flash meter - was Re: [OM] In the studio (of sorts), Charles Packard
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Re NASA lens, gary edwards
Next by Thread:	[OM] One last question, Tom Scales
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]