Giles,
I remember the posting that you are referring to, I also remember that
it could be classified as "institutional" because no one but an
institution could afford it. I seem to remember somewhere in the
vicinity of $100 for a relatively small amount.
Rand E.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Giles wrote:
>
> Lee Hawkins tested a stuff I use called Opticlean. I think I saved his
> post somewhere and could re-post it if anyone is interested.
>
> Opticlean is a polymer you paint on which then dries quite quickly.
> You then peel off the polymer like a skin with the aid af a sticky label.
> Any dust grease and whatever is retained in the polymer. The good thing
> about this stuff is there is absolutely no rubbing of the lens with
> anything so no possibility of abrasion.
>
> Lee tested this stuff on first surface mirrors of telescopes in an
> observatory.
>
> Giles
>
> Garry Lewis wrote:
>
> > I just wonder if it wouldn't be in everyone's best interest, to have an
> > series of "independent" tests performed by
> > an "independent" lab to put an end to the myths and legends and old
> > repairman's tales. To come up with answers.
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|