At 07:08 PM 26-04-00 Wednesday -0400, "JOHN SCHEUERER"
<jhs8956@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mike,
It's called the Tri-Elmar-M Aspherical.
A fellow by the name of Irwin Puts {Leica enthusiast} has a review on it
at the adress below.
J.S.
http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/m/lenses/pages/l11890.html
{OM content} I would definitely agree that the Zuiko 35/80 2.8 is a much
better if not cheaper deal. If there were 2 cameras that I could own they
would be the OM4Ti and a Leica... in that order. {which Leica I'm not sure
of yet, but I am still researching.
AND I WILL GET THEM!!!
paitently waiting .
J.S.
There is absolutely no question on the issue; a single stroke late model
M3, s/n > 1 million would do you just fine!
jh
I tried to send this message earlier but it didn't get through
so if it shows up a second time ... sorry bout that.
From: "Michael Stephens" <mike1964@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OM] 28/2 - first impressions
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:05:48 -0500
Doesn't Leica have a really nice variable focal length lens
for the rangefinders (like 28, 35, 50 or thereabouts) that does
exactly that? And of course if I remember correctly it was pricey
(like $2500 or $3k); it was however, a ~4.0 aperture, but it was
constant. Saw it at a trade show last year - it was really nice
- and the rangefinder focusing on the M6 was amazing.
{OM content} Comparatively, the 35-70/f2.8 Zuiko with an OM-3Ti
or OM-4Ti is a bargain!
Mike
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|