This happened to me just last week. "Only" had two bodies
with me, the backup being the OM-4, and I was using the 4T
in FP. Really made me wish I had the other 4T that I just
acquired.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barry B. Bean
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 12:20 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
On Wed, 3 May 2000 11:33:22 -0400, Riek, Christopher wrote:
> Granted that I do have an F280, but I don't
>use the high-speed sync all that often. Given that this camera will
>be a backup (alternate film and/or lens) Is it really worth the extra
>money to get the OM-4T over the OM-4? I'd appreciate some other
>opinions.
Yes. I can guarantee you that the first time you NEED your backup
body, you will be using your F280 in FP mode.
BB
-
B.B. Bean - Have horn, will travel
bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peach Orchard, MO
http://www.beancotton.com/bbbean.shtml
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|