| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body |
|---|---|
| From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 May 2000 16:06:33 +1000 |
My 4Ti and 2SP are the backup for my 1n. Never used them. Go 1n Foxy ----- Original Message ----- > Is there any reason why we should not consider a mechanical body as a > backup? No more battery brain concern, chilled battery ... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] O.T. vivitar 283 use "c" cell pak?, HI100 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Tom Scales, WKato |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body, Kam |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body, Ron Spolarich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |