Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body

Subject: RE: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
From: "Ron Spolarich" <caesar2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:16:26 -0400
Shame!  Not even to touch them? :-)

RonS 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Terry and Tracey
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 2:07 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
> 
> 
> My 4Ti and 2SP are the backup for my 1n. Never used them.
> 
> Go 1n
> 
> Foxy
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> > Is there any reason why we should not consider a mechanical body as a
> > backup?  No more battery brain concern, chilled battery ...
> 
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz