Hi Foxy,
I'm in the same position as you. I once owned all single digit OMs but have
finally settled with the mechanical ones. The OM-4(T) are great cameras, no
doubt at all. But I just love the mechanical bodies. I can still remember
the first time I heard the shutter of an OM-3, sweet is the only word for
it. Of OM-1 and 3, I marginally prefer the former. It is (just my own
view) more beautiful and more repairable. Repairability is important to me
as I do want a camera that I can still use 10 or 20 years later (Olympus
FTL).
Regards,
Kam
Hong Kong
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:28:14 +1000
From: "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-4T vs. OM-4 as backup body
Rarely. I used the 2SP for some flash photos at a wedding (happy snaps) but
TTL is useless with a room behind someone. Now I'm a fully manual man.
Can't remeber the last time I looked at them.
But at least I know they are there.
Foxy
- ----- Original Message -----
> Shame! Not even to touch them? :-)
>
> RonS
>
> > My 4Ti and 2SP are the backup for my 1n. Never used them.
> >
> > Go 1n
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|