ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Depth of field questions

Subject:	Re: [OM] Depth of field questions
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 6 May 2000 20:26:09 +0000

1:2

Giles

C.H.Ling wrote:

> 80/4. What is the magnification ratio for your amazing result? I also got
> 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, (continued) Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Gary Reese [OM] Olympus' Stabilization Method (was "Depth of field questions"), Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] Olympus' Stabilization Method (was "Depth of field questions"), Gregg Re: [OM] Olympus' Stabilization Method (was "Depth of field ques, Giles Re: [OM] Olympus' Stabilization Method (was "Depth of field ques, Volkhart Baumgaertner [OM] FS: An "Only to Church on Sunday" OM outfit, Gary Reese Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Volkhart Baumgaertner Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, frieder . faig Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, DAVDOU9211 Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Giles <= Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, John Prosper Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, John Prosper Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Frank Ernens Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, John Prosper Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Gary Reese [OM] Nw lens tests?, Tom Trottier Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, WKato Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Gary Reese Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, Gary Reese

Previous by Date:	Olympus Instruction Book Repro {was Re: [OM] Olympus PenF}, John Prosper
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, John Prosper
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, C.H.Ling
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Depth of field questions, John Prosper
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]