Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OK, I had to change the subject line - OT

Subject: Re: [OM] OK, I had to change the subject line - OT
From: "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 21:40:20 +0000
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date:          Sat, 10 Jun 2000 13:00:54 -0700

Subject: Re: [OM] OK, I had to change the subject line - OT
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 15:51:27 -0400


> Interestingly the fibreoptic glass in the flexible 'scopes is damaged
> by x-rays over time. The endoscopes are usually used under flouroscopy
> so they age by getting darker and darker until either they get re glassed
> or sold off as unserviceable. Some hospitals would have them re-fibred
> even though the cost was high because it came out of a maintenance
> budget instead of out of a capitol equipment budget which has a different
> approval route. Prior to the use of fibre optic scopes they used to use
> solid endoscopes (industrial versions are called borescopes) . The
> contortions required to use these on people was horrible!. For some
> e.n.t. (ear nose and throat) dept use they probably still use solid
> scopes whcih are  cheaper,less fragile,smaller and have better optical
> quality.

What kind of quality does an endoscope have, and what kind of optics?  Is it
a narrow field-of-view macro lens, or a fisheye lens?

>        I have to admit to being another list member  who owns an old
> endoscope. (Not Olympus) This unit is a solid unit which only has fibers
for
> the illumination section not the viewing section.
>




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz