Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Lens Quality: Stylus 3.5 VS Stylus Epic 2.8

Subject: Re: [OM] Lens Quality: Stylus 3.5 VS Stylus Epic 2.8
From: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:31:42 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Per Nordenberg wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Peterkin" <martlet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<SNIP>

> > thanks
> > to Ken, Per, George A and the other IS3 crowd,
> 
> Well, thank you Scott, but I'm actually into the iS-3000 crowd.     ;-)))
> 
> 
> > My only problem with the IS3 is that it makes me lazy
> > - and my
> > OM2n isn't used as much as I'd like.
> 
> I have the same problem with my OM-2SP...    ;-)

Well, I am always willing to "help" by "storing and exercising" OM2SP's
for people who do not use them :) Seriously, though I have never tried any
IS-camera, I cannot understand how anything can be better than an OM2SP -
they even (IMHO) beat the OM4's.....

--thomas


> 
> Per Nordenberg
> Zoo keeper at Kolmården
> http://www.kolmarden.com/
> 
> 
> ------
> Men occasionally stumble over the truth,
> but most of them pick themselves up
> and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
> 
>                                        W. Churchill
> ------
> 
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz